Finally I found something convincing about this topic... So far for me, and as I believe for many other people as well , including dictionaries the word equipment was a collective word and for this reason it had no plural, but I just found this at a site that made me change my mind. An expert was asked the same question and the reply was :
`I'd explain it by saying 'use' is the rule. Grammar is an attempt to find the patterns of a language and explain it. Grammar isn't a rule that language obeys. So, if we see such usage you can define it as OK (descriptive) or shun such usage (prescriptivist), but it's not going to stop the change.
200,000 friends of mine and me think you should just tell them it's OK.
Just tell them that some people say it that way, and some people don't. So, it's not a big deal. 'Equipments' is used by some and it's understandable. I'd say let it fly. !!!`
`I'd explain it by saying 'use' is the rule. Grammar is an attempt to find the patterns of a language and explain it. Grammar isn't a rule that language obeys. So, if we see such usage you can define it as OK (descriptive) or shun such usage (prescriptivist), but it's not going to stop the change.
200,000 friends of mine and me think you should just tell them it's OK.
Just tell them that some people say it that way, and some people don't. So, it's not a big deal. 'Equipments' is used by some and it's understandable. I'd say let it fly. !!!`
there you go!!!
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário